5 mid-range phones with better battery life than the Samsung Galaxy A56

We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

If there’s one feature you should pay close attention to when buying a phone, it’s battery life. Of course, there are other factors to consider when buying a new phone, such as camera, performance, software experience, storage, and display quality. If you bought the Samsung Galaxy A56 when it was released in 2025 and were impressed with the phone’s battery life and now need to upgrade to something newer with even better screen time, you’re not short of options.

This phone comes with a 5,000mAh battery, and according to independent testing by GSMArena, it can last up to 12 hours and 8 minutes on a single charge in combined usage, involving calls, web browsing, video streaming, and gaming. As expected, actual battery life will vary depending on your usage. Regardless, there are mid-range phones with much better battery life than what the Galaxy A56 offers.

For context, we use the term mid-range in this article to refer to smartphones that bridge the gap between entry-level phones and flagship phones, as there is no consensus in mainstream tech media on what a “mid-range phone” is. That said, we only considered phones with MSRPs between $350 and $650 as mid-range for the purposes of this article. You can learn more about our methodology at the end of the article.

The Galaxy A57 is the successor to the A56 and was launched in March 2026 by South Korean tech giant Samsung. Considering that it comes with a 5,000mAh battery and a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and FHD+ resolution similar to its predecessor, you might not expect this device to be your first choice when looking for a phone with better battery life than the Galaxy A56. Regardless, the Galaxy A57 offers better battery life than the A56, according to GSMArena.

In GSMArena testing, the phone lasted 13 hours and 59 minutes of combined usage, almost two hours longer than the Galaxy A56. Individually, the Galaxy A57 lasted up to 23 hours and 12 minutes for video streaming, 13 hours and 32 minutes for web browsing, 23 hours and 15 minutes for calls, and 7 hours and 12 minutes for gaming. And once you run out of charge, recharging the A57 shouldn’t take long, as it supports 45W wired charging. You can buy the Samsung Galaxy A57 on Amazon or Best Buy starting at $550.

Google’s Pixel 10a is another phone to consider if you need a mid-range phone with good battery life. Powered by a slightly larger 5,100mAh battery, the Pixel 10a supports 30W wired fast charging as well as 10W wireless charging. Although it only has 100mAh more battery capacity than the A56, the Pixel 10a can last around three hours longer. In GSMArena’s independent testing, this phone was able to last 15 hours and 13 minutes on mixed usage, which involves a combination of calls, web browsing, video streaming, and gaming.

The same tests show that the Pixel 10a can last up to 27 hours and 34 minutes on calls, 13 hours and 22 minutes on web browsing, 26 hours and 39 minutes on video streaming, and 8 hours and 4 minutes on playing video games. The Pixel 10a is helped in part by its slightly larger battery as well as its smaller 6.3-inch P-OLED display. The smartphone has a list price of $499, but Amazon sometimes sells it for $449 during sales.

If you’re looking for a phone that outperforms the Galaxy A56 but don’t mind locking yourself into Apple’s walled garden, the iPhone 17e is a strong contender. While the iPhone 17e only comes with a 4,005mAh battery, which is about 1,000mAh less than the Galaxy A56, it’s proof that a bigger battery doesn’t always translate to longer screen time. In fact, many Android phones with bigger batteries still struggle to beat Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max in terms of endurance. According to GSMArena’s battery tests, this phone lasted longer than the A56, although its small 6.1-inch OLED display likely played a role in improving its endurance.

The iPhone 17e can last 15 hours and 30 minutes on combined usage. However, this figure varies depending on how you use the device, as it lasted 29 hours and 14 minutes in calls, 14 hours and 34 minutes in web browsing, 18 hours and 56 minutes in video streaming, and 9 hours and 25 minutes in games. Compared to the Galaxy A56’s $499 launch price, the iPhone 17e is only $100 more but offers three hours of additional screen time, which is worth considering.

Nothing’s Phone (4a) Pro stands out as one of the most affordable phones with solid performance, as well as for its unique glyph lighting that differentiates the company’s phone lineup. On top of that, it’s a great choice if you need a phone that can last longer than the Samsung Galaxy A56. According to testing by GSMArena, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro was able to last for 15 hours and 16 minutes on combined usage, which is about three hours longer than the A56. However, in individual tests involving calling, video streaming, gaming, and web browsing, this device performed surprisingly well.

It lasts 38 hours and 21 minutes for calls, 12 hours and 42 minutes for web browsing, 24 hours and 4 minutes for video streaming, and 8 hours and 16 minutes for gaming. Compared to the Galaxy A56’s individual battery tests, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro beats it in all of them. The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro costs $499 for the base variant with 8GB memory and 128GB storage, and $599 for the variant with 12GB memory and 256GB storage. You can buy this phone on Amazon or Best Buy.

Another phone that will give you longer screen time than the A56 without breaking the bank is the Motorola Moto Edge 60 Pro. Launched in April 2025, the Moto Edge 60 Pro features a 6.7-inch P-OLED display and is powered by a larger 6,000mAh battery with support for 90W wired charging. Additionally, it supports wireless charging (up to 15W), which is a no-brainer in the mid-range segment. With the largest battery on this list, the Motorola Moto Edge 60 Pro also achieved the highest score of all our selected devices that beat the A56 in GSMArena’s battery test.

It lasted 16 hours and 14 minutes in mixed use and an impressive 10 hours and 45 minutes in single play. This phone lasted 29 hours and 17 minutes in calling tests, 14 hours and 56 minutes in web browsing, and 18 hours and 38 minutes in video streaming. You can buy the Motorola Moto Edge 60 Pro on Amazon starting at $450.

We used battery life test data from GSMArena to determine the battery life of the Samsung Galaxy A56. The Galaxy A56 lasted 12 hours and 8 minutes in the site’s battery life tests, and we relied on that as a baseline figure for comparison. With this figure, our job was to find phones that were not only mid-range but also offered longer screen time than Samsung’s phone in GSMArena’s tests. As a reminder, the site’s battery life test involves a mix of four different tests: calls, web browsing, gaming, and video streaming.

The combined results of all four tests are used to calculate the so-called Active Site Usage Score, which we used as a guideline for determining the A56’s base battery life. All of the phones we’ve listed have an MSRP between $350 and $650, which is the range we’ve used to define a mid-range phone in this article. All the phones we’ve recommended in this article cost anywhere in this range. There are plenty of other mid-range phones that beat the Galaxy A56 in battery life according to GSMArena’s testing, but we’ve only selected models officially sold in the US.